… Y: Is this really what we’re concerned with? Is our goal to sound intellectual? M: You’re misrepresenting it. If the description is flawed, analysis becomes impossible. Otherwise, all our effort is wasted. We need to describe the situation impartially. You can’t begin an analysis by dismissing what you can’t reach as worthless. Y: Reach what? A pile of pretentious jargon? D: Let’s call it exaggeration rather than pretentious jargon. This is a bit much, my friend. M: And how are we supposed to know what is “too much”? Y: How can we live without deciding what’s necessary? M: You’re … Continue reading A Philosophical Day 6- Science vs philosophy-religion