1.0DMY Philosophyhttps://www.dmy.info/endmy.infohttps://www.dmy.info/en/author/asdfg/rich600338<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="Z4OMGraGpa"><a href="https://www.dmy.info/en/a-philosophical-day-being-language/">A Philosophical Day- Being Language</a></blockquote><iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://www.dmy.info/en/a-philosophical-day-being-language/embed/#?secret=Z4OMGraGpa" width="600" height="338" title="“A Philosophical Day- Being Language” — DMY Philosophy" data-secret="Z4OMGraGpa" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"></iframe><script> /*! This file is auto-generated */ !function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&"undefined"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document); //# sourceURL=https://www.dmy.info/en/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js </script> … M: The ontological reductionism of language and the asymmetry it embodies cause objective reality to be dissolved within dichotomous categorizations; for linguistic signs, rather than being neutral reflectors by nature, are fraught with socially and ideologically constructed semantic loads. Semiotics reveals that every linguistic unit necessarily carries positional and labeling burdens: concepts are laden with layers of meaning accumulated throughout social history. In this context, because every attempt at comprehension is predetermined by the radically loaded semiotic codes of language, the relationship between subject and object inevitably undergoes an epistemic distortion; therefore, speaking in “black or white”—constructing a dualistichttps://www.dmy.info/en/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2026/06/image-4-1024x564.png